On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 9:44 AM Simon Tournier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, 01 May 2026 at 09:59, Simon Tournier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > GCD007: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships > > > > <https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/pulls/11> > > > The deliberation period ends on Thu, 14 May. > > If I count correctly (please double-check): > > - disapprove: 1 > - accept or support: 18 > > with 83 team members* => quorum 20.75. > > Therefore, applying GCD 001: > > The GCD is *accepted* if (1) at least 25% of all team members–as of > the > start of the “Deliberation Period”–send a reply, and (2) no one > disapproves. In other cases, the GCD is *withdrawn*. > > by (1) and by (2), this GCD 007 is withdrawn. > > IMHO, the project needs to clarify, at least: > > 1. team membership > 2. the role of maintainers > > thus, I’m convinced all the efforts Gabriel put in this material here > will be the basis for one or two or more new GCD. Because there is an > obvious need; I’ve been very sad to read this thread [1] 3 days ago. > > Thank you Gabriel for all the commitments, the patient answers and the > hard dedicated work! > > Cheers, > simon > > > *team members: bdunahu and gemmaro had been added to etc/teams.scm after > the start of Deliberation Period, so they aren’t counted as part of the > quorum. > > 1: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/8358#issuecomment-14746473
Simon, In the linked conversation you say "Somehow, we already had this discussion of team membership when discussing GCD 007". Could you link to this discussion and resolution in GCD 007? Greg
