Hi Greg, On Fri, 15 May 2026 at 15:22, Greg Hogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> The request was for a link to the discussion. The claim was that this > had been discussed. I don’t understand what you are trying to prove… Anyway! “Somehow*, we already had this discussion of team membership when discussing GCD 007" *Somehow: in some unspecified way. Well, considering the GCD title “Teams, Special Teams and Memberships” and considering that all this had been open to comment and under the Discussion Period for the whole 60 days, your request appears to me awkward, to put it mildly. Here are you acting in good faith when asking to specifically pinpoint some commentaries requiring the modification of this subsection “Team membership“? Well, I’ll not browse all the lengthy discussion because 1. Codeberg provides an horrible interface for that and 2. the discussion had been scattered between the mailing list and the Pull Request. However, I would like to point you this commit: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/pulls/11/commits/3908bbd70d6cd2e8d3aa3ac5804cc36dfbeda787 that modifies the “Team membership” subsection. It’ll probably not satisfy your request, who knows? >> Please read subsection “Team membership” [2]. >> >> And since this GCD 007 with the title “Teams, Special Teams and >> Memberships” had been under the Discussion Period for the whole 60 days, >> yes, I still think it’s correct to write: "Somehow, we already had this >> discussion of team membership when discussing GCD 007". >> >> You might disapprove the end result but this GCD proposed to clarify >> “team membership”, among other things. Anyway. > > Yes, clarified in the abstract, but with nothing concrete. Even the > thread that you replied to noted that "unfortunately > guix/guix-consensus-documents#11 [GCD 007] says little about this > either" [0]. Do you disagree that GCD 007 preserved the status quo? > > [0] https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/8358#issuecomment-14708370 Again, I don’t understand what you are trying to prove. I maintain what I wrote in this thread and in the Pull Request #8358. IMHO, the messages in #8358 proves one thing: Team membership needs a clarification and the status quo isn’t enough. It’s my last message about GCD 007 and now I move on. Cheers, simon
