I don't know about FS charging for scripts; I haven't used them in a year.
I do know there are third parties charging for jaws scripts; however, I hear
talk from people planning to do the same thing for window eyes scripts.

I can't blame third parties for charging for scripts, but I don't think the
screen reader companies should do so; I hope FS isn't really doing that.

Chip
 

-----Original Message-----
From: C. Richcreek Enterprises [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 11:22 AM
To: Chip Orange; [email protected]
Subject: Re: we vs jfw

Hi Chip, I could be wrong but doesn't JFW charge for their new scripts?
Where GW Micro and their scripters don't? Best, Craig B. Richcreek

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Chip Orange <mailto:[email protected]>  
        To: [email protected] 
        Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 10:34 AM
        Subject: RE: we vs jfw

        Hi Dennis,
         
        I switched from jaws, after about 10 years, to WE, about a year ago.
         
        It's fine if you really want to contact me privately to discuss
this, but I'd suggest a public discussion is much better.  others could
correct or disagree with any points I would make, and they could add to
anything I may have forgotten.  I think you'll get better info this way, and
if there are those who wish to say anything negative, and they don't wish to
say it on list, they can still contact you privately.
         
        I switched because I found the FS customer service to be completely
unresponsive; and this was a condition which continued over many instances
spanning many years.
         
        I also switched when I first read of the GW plans for scripting.  I
could see immediately what a *huge* benefit such a scripting system would be
towards allowing many more programs to become accessible.
         
        Not only is the GW scripting tool a fantastic tool for making an
application accessible, it's also a tool (if you'll forgive the pun) which
is accessible to the masses.  so, if you and a few others are using a
program that's not used by millions, and it has some accessibility problems,
it's very likely one of you could write and publish a script to correct
these problems.  no more begging the screen reader vendor to fix this
program in the next release, and being told by them that it's just not used
by enough of their customers to be worth the time of the vendor.  it's now
in the hands of the users themselves.  this is tremendously empowering!
         
        Yes, you could say jaws has the same scripting capability; but, I
tried for years to work with jaws scripts, and found the entire process
excruciatingly difficult, and poorly documented and/or supported.  
         
        And to prove my point, there has been an explosion of WE scripts
since the capability became available; I'd say more than all jaws scripts
ever published.
         
        How has my own experience been as a WE user verses being a jaws
user?
         
        Well, I have a paid up copy of jaws with 2 SMAs, and I haven't used
it in about a year.  that's the telling point I think.
         
        I find the support to be much more responsive.  are they always
right?  if WE always the better screen reader for a given program?  well, no
on both points.  But, GW cares about being right (helping you solve your
problem), and they care about making their product better.  I think they'd
like to make some money along the way too.
         
        In my opinion FS cares about making money; if they make their
product better along the way, how nice for you!  but it's not their
motivation.  You can see the difference in the last (largely bug-fix)
release of WE, which was free, while pretty much every release of jaws has
been a paid upgrade, no matter how little new functionality was introduced.
         
        I'm sure you could get down to the level of arguing which reader was
the better reader application by application; but seldom is this what
decides anyone.  most of us have to use a wide range of applications, so
that kind of comparison is rarely helpful I think.
         
        Finally, for those who aren't lucky enough to have someone purchase
your reader for you, GW offers a choice of purchasing plans involving a
series of small payments.  Last time I checked, FS had nothing like it; you
simply had to come up with all the money up front.  if you aren't sure about
switching to WE, then why not rent it for a month?  shouldn't cost you too
much to try it that way.
         
        ok, I guess I've hit the high points for me as to why I switched;
let me know if you have any questions.
         
        hth,
         
        Chip
         
         
         
         




        ------------------------------
        
        Chip Orange
        Database Administrator
        Florida Public Service Commission
        
        [email protected]
        (850) 413-6314
        
         (Any opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily reflect those of the Florida Public Service Commission.)
        

         


________________________________

                From: dennis [mailto:[email protected]] 
                Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 10:48 AM
                To: [email protected]
                Subject: we vs jfw
                
                
                could people who used both contac me?  strongly thinkin of
going to we want to know advantages and dis advantages of both 
                If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the
original
                sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list
and
                your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider
sending
                your message to [email protected] so the entire list will
receive it.
                
                All GW-Info messages are archived at
http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using
the search
                form at the bottom of the page. 
                
                If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
                [email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body 
                of the message.

        
        If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
        sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
        your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
        your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive
it.
        
        All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo,
and can be searched through and sorted using the search
        form at the bottom of the page. 
        
        If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
        [email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body 
        of the message.



If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is
related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can
be searched through and sorted using the search form at the bottom of the
page. 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be 
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page. 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body 
of the message.

Reply via email to