Yes, we're trying to make do with the patterns we've already got and the underdress was not included in this pattern. Cheers, Aylwen
On Jan 28, 2008 4:33 AM, Catherine Olanich Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 27 January 2008, Saragrace Knauf wrote: > > Why wouldn't she use the other patterns from PP 41? > > Just curious, > > Possibly because the PP patterns don't really have one for a kirtle; in some > of them at least, the underdress is faked. > > > > -- > Cathy Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool > than to open it and remove all doubt."-- Mark Twain > > _______________________________________________ > h-costume mailing list > h-costume@mail.indra.com > http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume > _______________________________________________ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
