On 01/05/2009, Owen Winkler <[email protected]> wrote: > > Michael Harris wrote: >> >> I wholeheartedly agree - except for minor point releases. Since these >> are security or data loss releases, these are the things we want >> people to go "OMG, there's a minor point release, I really need to >> upgrade to that!" The last thing we need is for people to get jaded >> and not upgrade them, potentially leaving Habari installations with >> known security holes. > > I believe that 0.6.1 as it stands is only a "bugfix" release in terms of > the beacon. If people's sites work fine without it, they can continue > to use whatever version they have without issue. > > If we were to do as you say and make the 0.0.x significant only for > security updates, then the next release version from the current > makaanga 0.x branch should be 0.7.
That's not what I said. > My final impression is that someone needs to say what we should do, > instead instead of saying what we should not do. We should decide on > this very quickly, everyone should understand how it will be > implemented, and it should be very clearly documented so that we never > have this discussion again. I have said what I think we should do. I'm in the minority, however, so just go ahead and release. -- Michael C. Harris, School of CS&IT, RMIT University http://twofishcreative.com/michael/blog IRC: michaeltwofish #habari --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
