Another vote for TestDisk, or to be more specific it's companion program PhotoRec[1]. It's a very handy tool for those "oh ****" moments.
It claims support for Mac OS X and HFS+, so I guess there's no need for special mount commands. [1] http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec Regards, Kerwin On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:00 PM, <hampshire-requ...@mailman.lug.org.uk> wrote: > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:41:27 +0100 > From: Benjie Gillam <ben...@jemjie.com> > Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Max OS HD image > To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List <hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk> > Message-ID: <1b81c1a0-66c8-407f-bf6f-b119bf6de...@jemjie.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > TestDisk does exactly that - it scans the whole disk looking for pieces of > data that look like they were JPG images (or whatever you're searching for - > it has a bunch of prebuilt filters) - which is why I recommended it. However > different filesystems lay out files in different places - e.g. at multiples > of 512bytes or other such things, but TestDisk might not have the rules for > HFS+. I suspect it will do its best nonetheless, which is why I suggested it. > > I've used TestDisk against both raw devices and dd images of devices before - > it should do what you want without having to mount the image. The mount > command was just in case you needed it, I'm sorry it confused my post. > > Cheers, > > Benjie. > -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk --------------------------------------------------------------
