On 18 July 2014 10:04, jay bennie <j...@lincore.com> wrote: > may be i see the plethora of freedoms of open critisim, courts that can > and do prosecute and voting for all as a panacea. >
the freedoms of open criticism which, when exercised against the powers-that-be, place your identity on the retrospective search algorithms that immediately aggregate your entire potted history for the past 10 years? yeah, I'd call that a panacea, too, though not for the same people I would guess. > what i also see is a lack of ability for legitimate spying on persons > breaking laws, polititions and business interests making secret deals > outside of law and police abuse of power. > > The problem is that "spying" isn't being done on persons breaking laws, it is done on everyone at all times. Right now you are being surveiled by the powers-that-be whether you like to believe it or not. > I also see 40% of the population read crap and base there opinion on > retoric and spin, and have an idealistic notion of a perfect socity and a > personalised view of right and wrong > 36% of that statistic was made-up on the spot. > people are corrupt! people break laws, fact. > that isn't being argued against. > you need tools to collect evidence, and courts of elected or just persons > to make judgements of right and wrong... anything less is folly. > nor is that. -- Daniel Llewellyn
-- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk --------------------------------------------------------------
