Hi, Willy has just released 1.5-dev9, but unfortunately the track functions can't yet track strings (and so URLs). I'll let you know once a nightly snapshot could do it and we could work on a proof of concept configuration.
Concerning 250K URLs, that should not be an issue at all to store them. Maybe looking for one URL could have a performance impact, we'll see. cheers On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:00 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great. > > So any ideas how many urls one can story in these sticky tables before it > becomes a problem? > > Would 250K be something of a concern? > > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Baptiste <bed...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Ok that sounds awesome, how will that work though? i.e. from say java, >> > how >> > will I do that? >> > >> > From what your saying it sounds like I will just have to modify the >> > response >> > add and a particular header. And on the flip side, if I want to unblock >> > I'll make a http request with something in the header that will unblock >> > it? >> > >> >> That's it. >> You'll have to track these headers with ACLs in HAProxy and to update >> the stick table accordingly. >> Then based on the value setup in the stick table, HAProxy can decide >> whether it will allow or reject the request. >> >> > When do you think this will go live? >> > >> >> In an other mail, Willy said he will release 1.5-dev9 today. >> So I guess it won't be too long now. Worste case would be later in the >> week or next week. >> >> cheers > >
