Yes it is the lookup that I am worried about. On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Baptiste <bed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Willy has just released 1.5-dev9, but unfortunately the track > functions can't yet track strings (and so URLs). > I'll let you know once a nightly snapshot could do it and we could > work on a proof of concept configuration. > > Concerning 250K URLs, that should not be an issue at all to store them. > Maybe looking for one URL could have a performance impact, we'll see. > > cheers > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:00 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Great. > > > > So any ideas how many urls one can story in these sticky tables before it > > becomes a problem? > > > > Would 250K be something of a concern? > > > > > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Baptiste <bed...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Ok that sounds awesome, how will that work though? i.e. from say > java, > >> > how > >> > will I do that? > >> > > >> > From what your saying it sounds like I will just have to modify the > >> > response > >> > add and a particular header. And on the flip side, if I want to > unblock > >> > I'll make a http request with something in the header that will > unblock > >> > it? > >> > > >> > >> That's it. > >> You'll have to track these headers with ACLs in HAProxy and to update > >> the stick table accordingly. > >> Then based on the value setup in the stick table, HAProxy can decide > >> whether it will allow or reject the request. > >> > >> > When do you think this will go live? > >> > > >> > >> In an other mail, Willy said he will release 1.5-dev9 today. > >> So I guess it won't be too long now. Worste case would be later in the > >> week or next week. > >> > >> cheers > > > > >
