Hi, I'm jut guessing, but to me it can work for URLs only, so in your case, it will match "/", "/customer/12345", and "/some/path?customerId=12345". For now, the string table can't have a concatenated string of 2 information, Host header and URL in your case. But who knows, maybe this feature will arrive soon too :)
cheers On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:33 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Baptiste, > > Whenever this feature will be implemented, will it work for a specific url > like: > > subdomain1.example.com > > What about by query string? like: > > www.example.com/customer/12345 > > or > > www.example.com/some/path?customerId=12345 > > > Will it work for all the above? > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:38 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes it is the lookup that I am worried about. >> >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Baptiste <bed...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Willy has just released 1.5-dev9, but unfortunately the track >>> functions can't yet track strings (and so URLs). >>> I'll let you know once a nightly snapshot could do it and we could >>> work on a proof of concept configuration. >>> >>> Concerning 250K URLs, that should not be an issue at all to store them. >>> Maybe looking for one URL could have a performance impact, we'll see. >>> >>> cheers >>> >>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:00 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Great. >>> > >>> > So any ideas how many urls one can story in these sticky tables before >>> > it >>> > becomes a problem? >>> > >>> > Would 250K be something of a concern? >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Baptiste <bed...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > Ok that sounds awesome, how will that work though? i.e. from say >>> >> > java, >>> >> > how >>> >> > will I do that? >>> >> > >>> >> > From what your saying it sounds like I will just have to modify the >>> >> > response >>> >> > add and a particular header. And on the flip side, if I want to >>> >> > unblock >>> >> > I'll make a http request with something in the header that will >>> >> > unblock >>> >> > it? >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> That's it. >>> >> You'll have to track these headers with ACLs in HAProxy and to update >>> >> the stick table accordingly. >>> >> Then based on the value setup in the stick table, HAProxy can decide >>> >> whether it will allow or reject the request. >>> >> >>> >> > When do you think this will go live? >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> In an other mail, Willy said he will release 1.5-dev9 today. >>> >> So I guess it won't be too long now. Worste case would be later in the >>> >> week or next week. >>> >> >>> >> cheers >>> > >>> > >> >> >
