+1 Aaron West
Loadbalancer.org Ltd. www.loadbalancer.org <https://www.loadbalancer.org/?gclid=ES2017> <https://plus.google.com/+LoadbalancerOrg> <https://twitter.com/loadbalancerorg> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/3191352?trk=prof-exp-company-name> <https://www.loadbalancer.org/?category=company&post-name=overview&?gclid=ES2017> <https://www.loadbalancer.org/?gclid=ES2017> +1 888 867 9504 / +44 (0)330 380 1064 aa...@loadbalancer.org LEAVE A REVIEW <http://collector.reviews.io/loadbalancer-org-inc-/new-review> | DEPLOYMENT GUIDES <https://www.loadbalancer.org/?category=resources&post-name=deployment-guides&?gclid=ES2017> | BLOG <https://www.loadbalancer.org/blog/?gclid=ES2017> On 2 January 2018 at 15:34, Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/01/2018 04:23 μμ, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > > On 2 January 2018 at 15:12, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > >> So please simply voice in. Just a few "please keep it alive" will be > >> enough to convince me, otherwise I'll mark it unmaintained. > > > > I don't use 1.4, but I do have a small reason to say please *do* mark > > it as unmaintained. > > > > The sustainability of haproxy is linked to the amount of work you (and > > a /relatively/ small set of people) both have to do and want to do. > > I would very much like it to continue happily, so I would vote to > > reduce your mental load and to mark 1.4 as unmaintained. > > > > +1 > > BTW: I don't use/look at haproxy 1.5 version as well... > > Cheers, > Pavlos > >
