Okay, I can certainly appreciate that. The web of interdependencies
in Vista modules (especially the clinical ones) does make it
difficult to simply ignore one you have no plans to use. But, as you
know, I think this is a problem crying out for a real solution, not
just another workaround (administrative or otherwise).
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
--Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Jul 9, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Nancy Anthracite wrote:
I think the point of using some of the imaging software is that
when patches
are applied to VistA, it would seem less likely to step on any
scanning
solution installed if the imaging routines used to retrieve
documents from a
server and link them to a patient were used to retrieve these
scanned images.
There is no necessity for the fancy software to display them as a
browser
would likely be fine for typical scans in a common format.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
