--- Kevin Toppenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All I can say is that no one has specified where the money is going
> to
> come from for all these fancy aspects of EMR's.  The price can not be
> passed on to the patients or to the insurance companies.  And I, for
> one, have no interest in paying $28,000 to "certify" that my EMR
> plays
> well with others.  If it works for me, OK.  But spending even more
> for
> interoperability seems to have diminishing returns.
> 
> Kevin
> 

But the way I read it, CCHIT is about a lot more than just
interoperability. It includes basic integrity of the record. See, for
example

<http://www.cchit.org/files/Ambulatory%20Domain/Final%20Criteria%20-%20FUNCTIONALITY%20-%20Ambulatory%20EHRs%20-%202006.pdf>

for an example of CCHIT criteria. How, for example is "The system shall
create and maintain medication lists" an interoperability requirement?

===
Gregory Woodhouse  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The Tao of VistA: If all you see is MUMPS, 
you see nothing.


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to