On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 10:42 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > I'm more interested in the modularity with this question - by the sound > of it, the verifier is an optional module.
No, a conforming implementation requires a bytecode verifier. AG
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 10:42 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > I'm more interested in the modularity with this question - by the sound > of it, the verifier is an optional module.
No, a conforming implementation requires a bytecode verifier. AG