Sven, yep...am hoping Harmony folks would help with classpath too under classpath terms and conditions of course.
-- dims On 5/14/05, Sven de Marothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given andy's post here, I should re-phrase my own wording: > > On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 03:35 +0200, Sven de Marothy wrote: > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > - We don't want to modify any classpath code. If we need changes, we > > > can work with classpath folks. > > > - We don't want to add classpath sources to our tree. this will avoid > > > local changes. > > > > Well, those two are of course obviously what we'd like best too. > > Naturally we want our code to be modified! We're hoping on lots of > improvements coming from the Harmony project. We just would prefer if > Harmony wouldn't have their own source tree. > > Currently a lot of class library fixes are being contributed to libgcj, > and syncing these is a lot of extra work. Dalibor has plenty of work > merging Classpath changes into Kaffe too. > > So it'd mean less work for everybody if Classpath was a single jar and > changes could go directly into our tree. > > /Sven > > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
