On 08-06-2005 00:08, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I. Division of Repository
+1 > II. Specific Access Control Lists +1 We could consider setting up a totally separate SVN repo for this, because the svn-authorization file would be the authoritive source of "tainting info" and we may want to publish that file. > III. Strict Limits on Committer Contribution +1 > IV. Be Proactive in Committer Education +1 > We could have [a legal form] as part of a standard svn commit message > template, for example. Other ideas welcome. Perhaps employ a post-commit hook that rejects commits that don't have a filled-out template. > we might consider a form asking information like the following. There's a lot in there. I don't feel qualified to comment. > Comments? Expanding on what I said in my other e-mail, "committer" is something that has many non-legal connotations here at the ASF. It might make sense to define all or most of this in terms of contributors. WDYT? - Leo
