Anthony, People who are willing to go the GPL route for their code have lots of avenues as u know...
-- dims On 11/18/05, Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 00:48 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > that's the prerogative of the contributor... > > No, I'm asking that the Harmony contribution process include a step > asking the contributor to dual license their code (along with the > reasoning). And then the contributor can make an informed decision at > an appropriate time. > > AG > > > > -- dims > > > > On 11/18/05, Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 00:36 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > Anthony, > > > > > > > > Am sure you are aware that Apache does not get contributors to assign > > > > copyrights to Apache when they contribute code. > > > > > > So why not simply have the Harmony contribution paperwork ask > > > contributors to dual license their code under both the Apache and GNU > > > Classpath licenses? > > > > > > AG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
