On 5/18/06, Chris Gray wrote:
On Thursday 18 May 2006 06:11, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > 2006/5/18, Chris Gray > > On Wednesday 17 May 2006 20:27, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > > Just FYI... > > > We WILL have cyclic dependencies. In AWT and Swing modules for example. > > > > Sorry, you've lost me. Do you mean AWT depends on Swing? That seems odd. > > Not much, but... > > Check java.awt.im.spi.InputMethodContext interface for example. One of > its methods returns JFrame. Blech. That also means Swing (or a stub) needs to be on the bootclasspath if AWT is used. (Just like java.security depends on java.awt, so even headless systems need to have java.awt.AWTPermission - but at least that's all within java.*).
AFAIK java.security doesn't depend on java.awt. Thanks, Stepan. Now that you mention it, I think we came across another example recently
where a java.* class depended on a javax.* one, just for one stupid method. Modularity is not Sun's strong suit. Thanks, Chris -- Chris Gray /k/ Embedded Java Solutions BE0503765045 Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi http://www.k-embedded-java.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] +32 3 216 0369 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division ------------------------------------------------------ Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
