And just to be an annoying nudge, I'll throw in my 0.02 : public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
if (oldInstance == null) { return null; } return getValue((ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance)); } (added newline after method decl, space after the if, and removed spaces inside getValue()) :) geir Mikhail Loenko wrote: > Hi Alexei > > Why do you think that your proposed style: > public Object get(Object oldInstance) { > ObjectNode node; > Object result; > > if (oldInstance == null) { > return null; > } > > node = nodes.get(oldInstance); > result = getValue(node); > > return result; > } > > is more transparent than original one: > public Object get(Object oldInstance) { > if(oldInstance == null) { > return null; > } > > ObjectNode node = (ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance); > Object result = getValue(node); > return result; > } > > > I'd rather change it something like this way: > public Object get(Object oldInstance) { > if(oldInstance == null) { > return null; > } > > return getValue( (ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance) ); > } > At least I'd get rid of the 'result' variable > > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]