And just to be an annoying nudge, I'll throw in my 0.02 :
public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
if (oldInstance == null) {
return null;
}
return getValue((ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance));
}
(added newline after method decl, space after the if, and removed spaces
inside getValue())
:)
geir
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> Hi Alexei
>
> Why do you think that your proposed style:
> public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
> ObjectNode node;
> Object result;
>
> if (oldInstance == null) {
> return null;
> }
>
> node = nodes.get(oldInstance);
> result = getValue(node);
>
> return result;
> }
>
> is more transparent than original one:
> public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
> if(oldInstance == null) {
> return null;
> }
>
> ObjectNode node = (ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance);
> Object result = getValue(node);
> return result;
> }
>
>
> I'd rather change it something like this way:
> public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
> if(oldInstance == null) {
> return null;
> }
>
> return getValue( (ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance) );
> }
> At least I'd get rid of the 'result' variable
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]