We have a bug. 0.0.0.0 should be all adapters, and is legit.
Can you file a JIRA?
Victor A Martynov wrote:
> Hello Mikhail,
>
> Here are the results of running the modified test:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> import java.net.*;
>
>
> public class Test {
>
> public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
> ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099, 0,
> InetAddress.getByName("0.0.0.0"));
> System.out.println(ss.getInetAddress());
> Socket s = new Socket("0.0.0.0", 1099);
> }
> }
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> c:\test>java Test
> /0.0.0.0
>
> c:\test>C:/Harmony/bin/ij -version
> Apache Harmony DRLVM HEAD-4807 (2006-05-02), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, debug
>
> c:\test>C:/Harmony/bin/ij Test
> /0.0.0.0
> java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not
> available
> at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
> PlainSocketImpl.java:238)
> at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
> PlainSocketImpl.java:200)
> at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715)
> at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:139)
> at Test.main(Test.java:10)
>
>
> =====
> Warm Regards,
>
> Victor Martynov,
> Intel Middleware Product Division
>
>
> On 7/20/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Add this line to the test to clarify the situation:
>> System.out.println(ss.getInetAddress());
>>
>> I think that for PC with multiple network adapters serversocket IP
>> must be
>> specified manually.
>>
>>
>> On 7/20/06, Victor A Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I'm having trouble with an application. This problem concerns creating
>> > java.net.Socket on host "0.0.0.0".
>> >
>> > The test below illustrates this problem:
>> >
>> > import java.net.*;
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > public class Test {
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
>> >
>> > ServerSocket ss = new ServerSocket(1099);
>> >
>> > Socket s = new Socket("0.0.0.0", 1099);
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > The output on RI and on Harmony differs:
>> >
>> > c:\test>java Test
>> >
>> > c:\test>C:/Harmony/bin/ij Test
>> >
>> > java.net.ConnectException: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:1099 - The address is not
>> > available
>> >
>> > at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
>> > PlainSocketImpl.java:238)
>> >
>> > at org.apache.harmony.luni.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(
>> > PlainSocketImpl.java:200)
>> >
>> > at java.net.Socket.startupSocket(Socket.java:715)
>> >
>> > at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:139)
>> >
>> > at Test.main(Test.java:7)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I wonder whether it is a bug in RI or a bug in LUNI of Harmony?
>> >
>> > =====
>> > Warm Regards,
>> >
>> > Victor Martynov,
>> > Intel Middleware Product Division
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mikhail Fursov
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
