GCv4 is an "old friend" actually :), dropping it from the main trunk will precisely "kill" it . Actually, I would say that it is usefull to have working GCv4 at least untill we are done with class unloading. So my -1 for a quarter.
Aleksey. On 11/3/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to know the opinion of Artem, Salikh and Alexey Ignatenko. They have used the GC and may have reasons to keep it. As for me, I occasionally use it (GCv4) and a modified version of GCv4.1 (which can help detect heap access via lost pointers). Most of the time I prefer second one, but sometimes it is helpful to run with completely different code base. I didn't try GCv5 yet. If it stable I will switch to it. -- Ivan On 11/2/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any reason to keep this around in the main branch?
