Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Yeah, put some logging statements in. Ask Tim if you need some help ;)
LOL, I'd be delighted. Of course, native code is different since there is no opportunity for introspection by the VM, so in this case logging is a necessary evil^W technique. Regards, Tim > I think we can do as you suggest, or simply document it somewhere. > Cleaerly if someone knows enough to switch GC, they have hit a manual or > code somewhere. > > I guess when I asked the original question, I was thinking that we > should just be clear that it's now deprecated, and therefore except for > required changes to keep compatible w/ the interface to GC, nothing > should change it. This was driven by my noticing that there was some > recent patches that worked on GCv4, not 4.1... > > geir -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
