Oh... I will try it on another machine on next Monday. Actually these days I have encountered several similar problems on linux that can be produce on one machine but not another. Both are related with thread/process creation and memory...
On 11/3/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leo, I've just tried and could not reproduce DRLVM failure (svn = r470676, (Nov 3 2006), Linux/ia32/gcc 3.3.3, debug build, SUSE9). I have only JRockit installed and got the following timings: BEA JRockit 1.5.0 4.6/4.6 Harmony j9 1.4/1.4 Harmony DRLVM (debug) 6.5/6.5 2006/11/3, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > They are the total test run times and I really feel that harmony launches > slower than RI. It is the most abvious difference not only from the above > result. > I have once tested the performance about net and the result ensures me that > harmony performances almost as good as RI although the test I run cannot be > said a formal performance test.:) > > > On 11/3/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 2006/11/3, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > More and more good new from day to day :) > > > > > > Thanks, Leo! > > > > > > SY, Alexey > > > > > > 2006/11/3, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi, all > > > > I have just tested JUnit4.1 on Harmony. > > > > With J9 VM, harmony passes both on windows xp2 and redhat > > enterprise > > > > 4.0. While drlvm fails on linux, which fails to create new thread > > becauseof > > > > out-of-memory-error. Since it can always be reproduced, I think > > actually > > > > system doesnot lack memory at the time. So I reported it as an > > > > application-oriented bugs as JIRA [1]. > > > > Besides I have got the time used in these tests which shows there > > is > > > > space for us to improve our performance. > > > > > > > > VM > > > > > > > > Windows xp2 > > > > > > > > Redhat Enterprise4 > > > > > > > > RI > > > > > > > > 0.985+0.921 > > > > > > > > 0.75+0.717 > > > > > > > > J9 > > > > > > > > 4.25+2.61 > > > > > > > > 2.888+2.897 > > > > > > > > drlvm > > > > > > > > 8.437+5.359 > > > > > > > > / > > > > > > > > *The former data represents the time to run junit.tests.AllTestsThe > > latter, > > > > junit.samples.AllTests. > > > > For detailed information, including how to run tests, I have > > posted it > > > > on Harmony wiki[2]. > > > > > > > > Looking at this times, I'd say they are mostly about startup time, not > > steady performance per se. I wonder how different these numbers are > > for release vs debug builds - guess Leo used debug versions. > > And surely there are some tricks RI does to achieve this momentary > > startup - as ClassDataSharing or resident-in-memory VM core after very > > first start. > > I eager to anticipate Harmony will compete strongly in this field soon > > enough. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2060 > > > > [2]http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/JUnit > > > > -- > > > > Leo Li > > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Leo Li > China Software Development Lab, IBM > >
-- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
