On 11/6/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> >> >> Paulex Yang wrote: >>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>> did we decide not to go to TestNG? >>> Sigh...I guess there must be too many ones have waited too long for >>> TestNG...(including me) >> >> I don't understand - what do you mean? > Nothing but a joke:). I mean, the TestNG depends on j.u.c, so that it > cannot be used for months, so people may think let's just use JUnit > instead... > What's left for j.u.c? I lost track of that Saga, IIRC.
I believe we're down to agreeing to the Objects/Threads classes [1] in luni-kernel and getting them implemented in DRLVM and the donated IBM VM. I believe the Unsafe class needs to be re-implemented with these interfaces, but that may already be done. -Nathan [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/kernel/vm/
> Ignore it, I'm all for TestNG...:) >> >> geir >> >>> >>> Paulex - being desperate >>> >> > >
