On 11/7/06, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/6/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Paulex Yang wrote:
> > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Paulex Yang wrote:
> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >>>> did we decide not to go to TestNG?
> >>> Sigh...I guess there must be too many ones have waited too long for
> >>> TestNG...(including me)
> >>
> >> I don't understand - what do you mean?
> > Nothing but a joke:). I mean, the TestNG depends on j.u.c, so that it
> > cannot be used for months, so people may think let's just use JUnit
> > instead...
> >
>
> What's left for j.u.c? I lost track of that Saga, IIRC.
I believe we're down to agreeing to the Objects/Threads classes [1] in
luni-kernel and getting them implemented in DRLVM and the donated IBM
VM. I believe the Unsafe class needs to be re-implemented with these
interfaces, but that may already be done.
Yes, I just run testNG successfully by appending suncompat.jar and
luni-kernel-stubs.jar to bootclasspath ;-)
-Nathan
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/kernel/vm/
>
> > Ignore it, I'm all for TestNG...:)
> >>
> >> geir
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Paulex - being desperate
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
Richard Liang
China Development Lab, IBM
