Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Be sure to not miss anyone :) This was a great community effort, with
everyone pitching in.
DRLVM is now a full peer to J9 in Harmony testing. :) We still need
to use J9 (and another VM that happens to work with our classlibrary),
as a sanity check, but we should from now on use DRLVM in our CI testing
framework.
On the other hand, to make sure DRLVM has no regressions regarding
to Classlibrary Unit Tests it makes sense to add these tests to the "test"
target of DRLVM build.
What do people think?
Adding classlib unit tests to DRLVM test target? No thanks :)
geir
Thanks,
Pavel
geir
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Oops, I've missed:
> * Andrew Zhang for reviewing class library patches and helpful
discussions
>
> On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>> According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit
>> tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great
>> team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep
>> inspiration. Kudos to you for the following (and not limited to this):
>>
>> * Alexey Varlamov and Elena for driving the whole process
>> * Anton and Vladimir Ivanov for automating test runs
>> * Geir and Gregory for checking and committing related DRLVM patches
>> * Paulex, Tim, Nathan, Stepan and Mikhail Loenko for checking and
>> committing related class library patches
>> * Alexey Petrenko for becoming ICU expert and writing good JIRA issue
>> resolution guidelines
>> * Alexei Zakharov for resolving class library test issues
>> * Ilya Okomin, Denis Kishenko, Oleg Khaschansky and Alexey Ivanov for
>> fixing class library and tests* Ivan, Egor, Mikhail Fursov, Nikolay
>> Sidelnikov and Alexander Astapchuk for making execution engines work
>> * Tatiana and Maxim for filing JIRA issues about test failures
>> * Nikolay Kuznetsov for completing thread interruption handling and
>> reverting consequences of park/unpark integration
>> * Pavel Afremov for fixing exception handling
>> * Boris Kuznetsov for intelligent fixing of security tests
>> * Rana and Salikh for evaluating and discussing problems, reviewing
>> and trying DRLVM patches
>> * Pavel Pervov and Evgueni for help with DRLVM patches
>> * Artem for discovering and fixing weird Windows* behavior
>> * My wife for bringing hot tea to the computer during sleepless nights
>>
>> There are still open issues with reliability, multiprocessor and other
>> special configurations, so the page
>> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM remains
>> active. But this shouldn't prevent us from including class library
>> testing into Harmony "zero regression" policy. What do you think?
>>
>> --
>> Thank you,
>> Alexei
>
>
>
