Egor Pasko wrote: > I am for (2) too. But a small correction: rollback is not always > reasonable. We can explicitly agree if we do rollback or fix ASAP (as > we did with TM and launcher).
Of course, thank you -- it is always better to fix it and move forward when that can be done quickly rather than be required to back code out. That is how we have been working to date and it is working well. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
