2006/11/16, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
why not?
But what benefit it would bring? build test in DRLVM takes too much time already, I'm afraid people will just stop using it :(
This is analogous to enforcing full testing in classlib for every change regardless of module. Evidently this is too expensive.
2006/11/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote: > > On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Be sure to not miss anyone :) This was a great community effort, with > >> everyone pitching in. > >> > >> DRLVM is now a full peer to J9 in Harmony testing. :) We still need > >> to use J9 (and another VM that happens to work with our classlibrary), > >> as a sanity check, but we should from now on use DRLVM in our CI testing > >> framework. > > > > > > On the other hand, to make sure DRLVM has no regressions regarding > > to Classlibrary Unit Tests it makes sense to add these tests to the "test" > > target of DRLVM build. > > What do people think? > > Adding classlib unit tests to DRLVM test target? No thanks :) > > geir > > > > > Thanks, > > Pavel > > > > > > > >> geir > >> > >> > >> Alexei Fedotov wrote: > >> > Oops, I've missed: > >> > * Andrew Zhang for reviewing class library patches and helpful > >> discussions > >> > > >> > On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Folks, > >> >> According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit > >> >> tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great > >> >> team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep > >> >> inspiration. Kudos to you for the following (and not limited to this): > >> >> > >> >> * Alexey Varlamov and Elena for driving the whole process > >> >> * Anton and Vladimir Ivanov for automating test runs > >> >> * Geir and Gregory for checking and committing related DRLVM patches > >> >> * Paulex, Tim, Nathan, Stepan and Mikhail Loenko for checking and > >> >> committing related class library patches > >> >> * Alexey Petrenko for becoming ICU expert and writing good JIRA issue > >> >> resolution guidelines > >> >> * Alexei Zakharov for resolving class library test issues > >> >> * Ilya Okomin, Denis Kishenko, Oleg Khaschansky and Alexey Ivanov for > >> >> fixing class library and tests* Ivan, Egor, Mikhail Fursov, Nikolay > >> >> Sidelnikov and Alexander Astapchuk for making execution engines work > >> >> * Tatiana and Maxim for filing JIRA issues about test failures > >> >> * Nikolay Kuznetsov for completing thread interruption handling and > >> >> reverting consequences of park/unpark integration > >> >> * Pavel Afremov for fixing exception handling > >> >> * Boris Kuznetsov for intelligent fixing of security tests > >> >> * Rana and Salikh for evaluating and discussing problems, reviewing > >> >> and trying DRLVM patches > >> >> * Pavel Pervov and Evgueni for help with DRLVM patches > >> >> * Artem for discovering and fixing weird Windows* behavior > >> >> * My wife for bringing hot tea to the computer during sleepless nights > >> >> > >> >> There are still open issues with reliability, multiprocessor and other > >> >> special configurations, so the page > >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM remains > >> >> active. But this shouldn't prevent us from including class library > >> >> testing into Harmony "zero regression" policy. What do you think? > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Thank you, > >> >> Alexei > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
