2007/11/19, brad clawsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The problem is that only one person gets to comment on the quality of > > > a library, the author, who is about the least objective person. > > by rolling certain libraries into a base distribution, i was implying > that there would be more eyeballs focusing on making them > feature-complete. furthermore, by closely associating these libraries > into a base distribution, there will be a sense of urgency associated > with closing major bugs.
If you look at the stability tag of ghc libraries you will see that a lot of them are marked as "provisional" (Network.URI for example) or "experimental" (Control.Monad.Trans). Although I would love to see some other standard libraries (MaybeT !), I think that current base should be solid first. Just My $0.02 , Radek. -- Codeside: http://codeside.org/ Przedszkole Miejskie nr 86 w Lodzi: http://www.pm86.pl/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
