Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007, at 15:13 , Neil Mitchell wrote: > > >> - The packages seem to be of quite variable quality. Some are > >> excellent, > >> some are rather poor (or just not maintained any more). > > > > The problem is that only one person gets to comment on the quality of > > a library, the author, who is about the least objective person. > > The ability to "vote" on packages might be interesting here. If > there's 4 HTML libraries and one of them gets lots of votes, it's > probably the one to look at first. >
It occurred to me that the voting could be implicit. That is, if 10 libraries/programs use library X, then library X gets 10 votes. Kind of like Google PageRank for libraries. Greetings, Mads Lindstrøm _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
