On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007, at 15:47 , Radosław Grzanka wrote: > > > If you look at the stability tag of ghc libraries you will see that a > > lot of them are marked as "provisional" (Network.URI for example) or > > "experimental" (Control.Monad.Trans). > > This may not refer to what most people care about; the "experimental" > stability of Control.Monad.Trans is related to its use of fundeps and > undecidable instances, and the possibility (likelihood?) of its being > switched to type families (which "shouldn't" change its user-visible > interface, as I understand it).
I like to see MTL split into a Haskell98 part and an advanced part. I mostly use functionality which would nicely fit into a Haskell98 interface and find it annoying that by importing MTL my code becomes less portable. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
