brad clawsie wrote:
in any case, batteries included or not, ghc seems to have reached a
point of stability, high performance, and lots of neat fundamental
features that it can be left alone for a short time. i would love to
see 2008 be the year we direct time and effort to solve filling holes
in the libraries.
I would love to be skilled enough to actually help fix these "holes"
rather than just complaining about them... Sadly, I'm not.
I've got an MD5 library I'm working on, and I've got a thin layer over
Gtk2hs that should make writing programs that render bitmaps easier.
(E.g., ray tracers, fractal generators... all the kinds of things I like
writing!) If I ever manage to mangle those into a working state, I'll
happily hand 'em over. But that's not going to make a huge difference to
the HackageDB as a whole...
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
