Achim Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The surest thing to make people switch is to make them not aware of > it, i.e. make things look exactly like in C, with incremental updates > of the same variable and everything, while still retaining a purely > functional semantic under the hood. > > I guess that's why success has to be avoided at all cost. >
But, still, I bet people would like to see Warning: Statements without effect: "c <- return 1 >>= increment >> return 2" ^^^^^^^^ *** ^^^ || when they write c = 1 ++c c = 2 -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying, hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this signature prohibited. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe