On Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:53:39 +0800
 Lyndon While <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 6:46 pm -0400 10/8/2000, Benjamin Leon Russell wrote:
> >Somebody once wrote that a clearly written,
> well-documented program 
> >that doesn't work is usually more valuable than a badly
> written, 
> >poorly-documented program that does work because it can
> easily be 
> >fixed and reused.
> 
> Who wrote this?
> 
> Is it just a rumour or is there a reference that I can
> give to my students?

There is a reference, but it is in a book that I read months ago, probably while 
browsing through the local bookstore.  I just looked through _The Practice of 
Programming,_ by Kernighan & Pike, but apparently it wasn't in that book.

Trying to find it is a little like looking for a needle in a haystack.  It is probably 
in some other book on programming style.  I'll try to look it up when I have time and 
let you know when I find it again.

--Ben
--
Benjamin L. Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Furuike ya!  Kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto."  --Matsuo Basho

Reply via email to