On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 05:41:46 -0500, Peter da Silva <pe...@taronga.com> wrote:
> On 2008-07-03, at 21:27, Phil Pennock wrote: > > It's not what they want, because the people using HTML-capable > > mail-clients would also see the text. > > Then they should include a text version of the HTML. > > Or not include the text at all. > > Including text that is NOT an "alternative" version of the HTML is > the wrong solution no matter what their goal. I esp don't like it when the text version of the **/alternative tells me that my mail client isn't capable of showing their HTML shit. That is so wrong. Don't they get it that I don't WANT to see their garbage at all. My M-C is perfectly able to show HTML, but I've chosen to set it to just display the text part instead. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.10.x, 5.11.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11, 11.23, and 11.31, SuSE 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3, AIX 5.2, and Cygwin. http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
