Think about how hatefully you might write a program to wrap combining
characters to 80 columns, or how hateful you might find writing that program
to be.

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Walt Mankowski <
waltman-hates-softw...@mawode.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:53:39AM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote:
> >> I don't *care* what editor I use, as long as it's reasonable.
> >
> > This issue has nothing to do with editors.
> >
> > Whether you use Pico, EZedit, vi, Emacs, or TECO, there's no law that
> > says the mail software can't reflow the text before passing it to the
> > editor, the same way GUI mail software does before passing the text to
> > the text widget.
> >
> > Personally, I prefer mail software not do that, but that's because my
> > editor (vi) makes reflowing easy with the "!}fmt" command. I don't see
> > any reason, though, why mail software shouldn't have that option
> > available for people who find reflowing an arduous process.
> >
> > So go ahead and hate Mutt, and I'll keep on hating Pine.
>
> Why stop there?  Let's also hate the software that's generating all
> these unwrapped paragraphs to begin with!
>
> Walt
>
>

Reply via email to