On Jun 14, 2012, at 3:39 AM, Peter da Silva wrote: > On 2012-06-13, at 10:41, David Cantrell wrote: >> My first impressions of Go are good, but that means it's off-topic. > > It looks way too high level to replace 'C'. > > Oh, sorry, I mean "optional semicolons? rant rant!"
What could be better than trying to graft pythonesque formatting restrictions onto a C++-alike? It's certainly in keeping with the more bizarre design goals of Plan9 and the Python-worship at Google, and it gives Google their own pet language to put up next to Microsoft's C# -david parsons
