-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#review7587
-----------------------------------------------------------


Looks good overall. Some nitpicks and minor changes. Will try and run through 
it again.


/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatClient.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16774>

    the long?



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatCreateDBDesc.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16780>

    nitpick: I like "toHiveDB" better like "toString", "toInt", etc.



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatCreateTableDesc.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16781>

    nitpick: indentation



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatCreateTableDesc.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16795>

    indentation is not aligned



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatCreateTableDesc.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16783>

    can numBuckets exist without buketCols being set? If this isn't the case 
maybe they should be combined into just one builder method?



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatHMSImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16785>

    nitpick: HCatClientHMSImpl?



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatHMSImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16786>

    nitpick: indentation



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatHMSImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16787>

    should we be putting logic here? this should just be a thin wrapper.



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatHMSImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16788>

    same with this logic.



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatHMSImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16789>

    if we don't set it what will happen? will hms set it for us?



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatPartition.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16790>

    why is this always null?



/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/common/HCatUtil.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16775>

    It seems cleaner to encapsulate this logic in HCatClient.create()?



/trunk/src/test/org/apache/hcatalog/api/TestHCatClient.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16793>

    I'd have the same statement execute before this but with ifNotExists set to 
false. This way you get to test that the previous table was dropped.



/trunk/src/test/org/apache/hcatalog/api/TestHCatClient.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/#comment16794>

    should verify the schema as well


- Francis


On 2012-05-03 00:24:21, Vandana Ayyalasomayajula wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-05-03 00:24:21)
> 
> 
> Review request for hcatalog, Francis Liu, David Capwell, and Rohini 
> Palaniswamy.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> HCatalog java APIs for DDL commands.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatAddPartitionDesc.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatClient.java PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatCreateDBDesc.java PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatCreateTableDesc.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatDatabase.java PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatHMSImpl.java PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatPartition.java PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/api/HCatTable.java PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/common/HCatConstants.java 1333272 
>   /trunk/src/java/org/apache/hcatalog/common/HCatUtil.java 1333272 
>   /trunk/src/test/org/apache/hcatalog/api/TestHCatClient.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4940/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit test passes. 
> 
> TODO:
> 
> - cover more test cases.
> - E2E tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vandana
> 
>

Reply via email to