Michael Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 21:19 +0200, Omry Yadan wrote: >> Booting people with zero balance is fine. >> preventing service from people who have 3 months worth of payments is >> not fine. > <SNIP> >> That's what I think, anyway. >> >> Omry. > > Omry, > > As discussed before, in practice, a significant number of people quietly > vanished, went negative, and the rest of us were picking up their tab. > The only practical solution is to raise the bar, hence the new balance > requirement. > > Michael Potter >
"As discussed before" but unseen by some, including Omry. Can the board backtrack enough to present a clear picture of the new policy? That is, can we get an e-mail from the board to hcoop-announce giving - a brief explanation of the problem - a proposed solution, including effective date after at least 30 days - feedback period in [hcoop-discuss] Can we get a second e-mail, board to hcoop-announce, when the policy comes into effect. Can we have an option to receive a monthly statement? Can the portal page show an explanation for the ( a NEW gif) change that emphasizes "this change will save you money" and "unused funds refunded on request." I agree with the general response: sudden change in the apparent balances on the members portal causes confusion and leaves the impression of a price increase. I hope other readers will take time to contribute and to read. Thank you once again to the volunteers giving their time to make this work. Stephen Taylor/duoduo on IRC Freenode #hcoop -- _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
