On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:14:53PM -0500, Steve Taylor wrote: > Michael Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 21:19 +0200, Omry Yadan wrote: > >> Booting people with zero balance is fine. > >> preventing service from people who have 3 months worth of payments is > >> not fine. > > <SNIP> > >> That's what I think, anyway. > >> > >> Omry. > > > > Omry, > > > > As discussed before, in practice, a significant number of people quietly > > vanished, went negative, and the rest of us were picking up their tab. > > The only practical solution is to raise the bar, hence the new balance > > requirement. > > > > Michael Potter > > > > "As discussed before" but unseen by some, including Omry. > > Can the board backtrack enough to present a clear picture of the new > policy? That is, can we get an e-mail from the board to hcoop-announce > giving > > - a brief explanation of the problem > - a proposed solution, including effective date after at least 30 days > - feedback period in [hcoop-discuss] > > .....
Sure, we'll do that. But I think this was more informal communication on the list and no sudden changes are going to take place. -doc _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
