Nathan Kennedy wrote: > I don't think the deposit should be based on 3 months at pledge level. > I think it should be based on three months at the minimum contribution > level and be the same for everyone. >
I'm open to any idea where we aren't providing services without payment at any point. Certainly modifying my plan only by ignoring pledge amounts wouldn't achieve this goal; the regular deposit might not be enough to cover even a single month's payment by someone with a high pledge. > I think that our system should, for any member whose (new sense) balance > reaches zero, should automatically reduce their pledge level to 1 > immediately, This is a great idea. Too bad that it requires some additions to the portal, but I think it's worth doing. :-) > and that pending implementation of this, we should unwind > and bill out any donations above the 1 unit pledge level out to the > membership from members who have negative balances. There probably > aren't many in that situation anyway. And that the balance should be > the same for everyone, based on 1 unit pledge level. > You're suggesting forcing the membership at large to pay for the extra charges that a few members incurred by setting pledges too high? I'm still in favor of doing a one-time request for voluntary contributions to cover negative balances of departed members, but it doesn't make sense to me for people who still want to be members in good standing. _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
