+1 (non binding) If this gets in, a backport to branch-2 would be most appreciated.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@alumni.cmu.edu>wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to merge the HDFS-347 branch back to trunk. It's been > under intensive review and testing for several months. The branch > adds a lot of new unit tests, and passes Jenkins as of 2/15 [1] > > We have tested HDFS-347 with both random and sequential workloads. The > short-circuit case is substantially faster [2], and overall > performance looks very good. This is especially encouraging given > that the initial goal of this work was to make security compatible > with short-circuit local reads, rather than to optimize the > short-circuit code path. We've also stress-tested HDFS-347 on a > number of clusters. > > This iniial VOTE is to merge only into trunk. Just as we have done > with our other recent merges, we will consider merging into branch-2 > after the code has been in trunk for few weeks. > > Please cast your vote by EOD Sunday 2/24. > > best, > Colin McCabe > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-347?focusedCommentId=13579704&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13579704 > > [2] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-347?focusedCommentId=13551755&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13551755 > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
