On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <szets...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Another > substantive concern is that HDFS-347 is not as well tested as > HDFS-2246. So, we should keep HDFS-2246 around for sometime and remove > it later. Is this the usual practice? > I'm proposing we do just that - keep HDFS-2246 around in branch-2 to let HDFS-347 soak a bit on trunk and then remove HDFS-2246 from branch-2 once we're confident in HDFS-347 and trunk adds Windows support. As Colin pointed out, this VOTE has always been about only merging this branch to trunk. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera
