Thanks  Neil and Gabriel!!!!

The reason for the question is the correct use of the LCSH subdivision: 
Introductions.

According to SHM this subdivision is to only be used under Sacred works.

Based on what Neil and Gabriel say, I will not use it in the record for that i 
am working on (a Hebrew translation to the introduction of the Zohar).

That being said: According to RDA (Original Toolkit)  Talmud would also be 
considered a Sacred  work (RDA 6.23.2.5); along with Bible.

Midrash would not.

Thanks, Heidi




Heidi G. Lerner

Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica

Metadata Dept.

Stanford University Libraries

Stanford, CA 94305-6004

ph: 650-725-9953

fax: 650-725-1120

e-mail: ler...@stanford.edu

________________________________
From: Neil Manel Frau-Cortes <nf...@umd.edu>
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 5:20 AM
To: Heidi G Lerner <ler...@stanford.edu>; Hebrew Name Authority Funnel 
<heb-naco@lists.osu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] Sacred work

I think this is a great question, and probably the fruit of applying an 
anglocentric category to a body of literature that doesn't match. We should 
consider if anything we call sifre kodesh is actually a sacred text in the 
spirit of the LC category.

That said, even inside of the sphere of sifre kodesh, I think that the Zohar is 
major, called Zohar ha-kadosh, which is a qualificative we don't find applied 
to many other rabbinic works. This brings me to the question: what else is 
Sacred Texts in our cannon? Other than the Tanakh, should we include the Talmud 
(Mishnah, Tosefta?)? I wouldn't include the midrash as a number of rishonim, 
like Duran, consider it to be holy, yet "not to be taken literally." Yet, the 
Zohar is midrashic in nature. It's all a conundrum. If people are interested, 
perhaps we can talk more about that in our RAS Cataloging Summer meeting, since 
the Winter's agenda is already quite full.

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:47 PM Heidi G Lerner via Heb-naco 
<heb-naco@lists.osu.edu<mailto:heb-naco@lists.osu.edu>> wrote:
Hi all,

I have a question: for purposes of correct application of LC Subject Heading 
Manual and RDA, is the Zohar considered a Sacred work.

Thanks , Heidi


Heidi G. Lerner

Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica

Metadata Dept.

Stanford University Libraries

Stanford, CA 94305-6004

ph: 650-725-9953

fax: 650-725-1120

e-mail: ler...@stanford.edu<mailto:ler...@stanford.edu>

_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu<mailto:Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu>
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco


--

Neil M. Frau-Cortes, Ph.D. (he, him, his)

Assistant Head, Cataloging & Metadata Services

(Metadata Creation & Enhancement)


University of Maryland

2200 McKeldin Library

College Park, MD 20742

Phone (301) 405-9337

nf...@umd.edu<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://nfrau@umd.edu__;!!KGKeukY!g3xbZPvNuxCOWUVjP-3h6K6AZcYIhjQcRLmdw_IOZ60l3TTwg3kv89ir6mE5mimGrN_6$
 >

ORCID ID: 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-1405__;!!KGKeukY!g3xbZPvNuxCOWUVjP-3h6K6AZcYIhjQcRLmdw_IOZ60l3TTwg3kv89ir6mE5mq2SiRvW$
 

_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco

Reply via email to