I think you're missing a few of the important points.  Yes, it's
important to have this feature, but:

a) It broke binary and source level backwards compatibility.  That's a
big no-no.
b) It restricts all commands, which is unnecessary.  A better solution
would be to flag the commands which need to be protected, or to flag
things registered in the client.  This would plugins continue to
register and trigger their own commands, preserving compatibility.
c) It defaults to on, which going back to a), breaks expected functionality.
d) Going back to a) again, for an update like this, forewarning would be
nice.

Those are the issues I have with it, at least.

   ~dvander
   http://www.bailopan.net/

Benjamin Davison wrote:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Yeah I love it when some 14 year old server admin fucks with my settings and
sets my fire command to a suicide command.

This is a good console command that was loooong overdue.

On 11/18/06, Paul Peloski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I don't think cl_restrict_server_commands is a mistake or bug. If there
are
exploitable client cvars that need to be monitored by a server plugin,
those
exploits need to be fixed. Officially supported fixes (not Mani-mod client
cvar enforcement) carry the benefit of games that are harder to exploit
out
of the box, and we don't have to worry about malicious server admins
having
unwanted access to client settings.

Think of a web-page that has the ability to change your web browser
settings. It might be nice for a web designer to stick his site in your
bookmarks or make sure you don't set your font size too large and break
his
layout, but, it's your web browser and your browsing preferences shouldn't
have anything to do with the web-page author.

I wouldn't address Valve like morons or cowards, it's impolite. Your point
has some merit but the new cvar is hardly an outrage: why can't admins
just
use Mani-mod to kick/warn users who set their rate too high, instead of
setting the rate for them?

Regards,

Paul

On 11/17/06, Frazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For those who may not be following other forums - check this thread out
on
the mani forum.



http://www.mani-admin-plugin.com/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=26&topic=33
03.15


The growing consensus seems to be in favour of a mani mod update that
kicks
players with the default setting, which was applied for them courtesy of
Valve.  Posts in this forum seem to be landing on deaf ears - but I
suspect
that if this little movement picks up momentum - then its really going
to
get ugly fast.

Valve:  realize and admit the mistake and fix it.  Admins are NOT your
enemy
- not yet, at least.   If this auto-kicking thing takes hold, then your
PAYING customers are going to feel it.

And one more thing Valve - have the balls and courtesy to respond to the
concerns being expressed here.



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders


--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders




--
- Benjamin Davison
--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Reply via email to