On Apr 6, 2005 5:14 PM, Kerry Dorsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kevin Cantrell wrote: > > >yeh Germany is a bit far for me, but it still played > >fairly well... > > > >I am testing tonight also, I password protected all > >but one of my pubs. > >and bumped the -tickrate up to 100 and fps_max to 1000 > >the console is showing around 512fps. > >I run Dual 1ghz CPU's and 2.5gb ECC ram. so I am > >interested if the tickrate setting will be too much > >when the server gets full later tonight. > >My server is in Dallas at a fast co-location facility > >right on the backbone. > > > >If anyone wants to test it out it's 69.13.208.40:27015 > > > > > >--- Kyrios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>It's server located in germany ;) So testing from > >>the us won't be very > >>intelligent :P I should have mentioned that ;) > >> > >>On Apr 6, 2005 1:15 AM, Kevin Cantrell > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I had 150 ping on your server . > >>> > >>>so I couldn't see anything different. > >>> > >>> > >>>--- Kyrios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>On Apr 6, 2005 12:44 AM, wArgOd > >>>> > >>>> > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Kyrios wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>So it must be just a subjective feeling. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>Perhaps > >> > >> > >>>>this is supported by > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>the sound also beeing "smoother". > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>be sure to solicit opinions from a number of > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>players. > >>>>Already done. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>I bet the response will be "seems like i move > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>faster here", etc. > >>>>Try it yourself. Server IP was in the last > >>>> > >>>> > >>email. > >> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>_______________________________________________ > >> > >> > >>>>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>view the list archives, please visit: > >>>> > >>>> > >>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >> > >> > >>>>-- > >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>... black holes are where god divided by zero. > >>>> > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or > >>>> > >>>> > >>view > >> > >> > >>>>the list archives, please visit: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >> > >> > >>>__________________________________ > >>>Yahoo! Messenger > >>>Show us what our next emoticon should look like. > >>> > >>> > >>Join the fun. > >> > >> > >>http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest > >> > >> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or > >>> > >>> > >>view the list archives, please visit: > >> > >> > >>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >> > >> > >>-- > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>... black holes are where god divided by zero. > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view > >>the list archives, please visit: > >>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >__________________________________ > >Yahoo! Messenger > >Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. > >http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest > > > >_______________________________________________ > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >please visit: > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > I too ran tests last night on our private CS:S server . All previous > netcode settings were totally stock before (fps_max 300). The only > adjustments made were: > > fps_max 500 > > launch Windows Media player and minimize at the local console > > Immediately, the FPS went from a consistent 99fps to 499.27! Keeping > the previously unspecified fps_max setting (300), but running Media > player yielded 299+fps. Thus, proving the media clock lock theory. I don't know if u can say theory anymore. There is a article in the official steam-support DB suggesting to use Mediaplayer. > Without Media Player = 99fps max regardless of fps_max setting. With > Media Player = fps reflecting max_fps setting. I never made any > -tickrate changes. If the objective was to increase overall fps, then > this shouldn't be a necessary procedure. This was clear to me. If not to others I shoudl have pointed that out more clearly.
>From what Alfred posted in the other thread, tickrate in Source DS the simulation updatefrequency. Suppose the server runs at 1000fps and every client gets all requested packages. All Clients use updaterate 100. Your client then really gets 100 packets a second. But (how I understood it) just 33/s are real new data. I'm really just guessing. Would be very nice if Alfred could explain the relation between server fps and server tickrate. > > My test system is a 2.8 P4e w/ 2GB on a 3Mb muxed T-1 circuit. Total > player load was 10ppl. Lower loads were filled w/ bots for a minimum of > 8 players at any given time. Every player noticed an improved latency by > at least 10ms and commented on the improved fluidity of gameplay. The > server is located in the Midwest USA and players were located across the > US and Canada. > > The only remaining question is how bandwidth use was altered as a result > of this test? General MRTG graphs showed NO change, but since the CPU > load didn't seem to change either (I run srcds as a service) *something* > had to change. Did anyone else notice any throughput changes? > > Kerry > www.mikesmarauders.com > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- ... black holes are where god divided by zero. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
