I hope you have a lot of bandwidth. :) Luke Lewis wrote: > Yeah most people I have talked to say they run at least as well if not a lot > better than the Dual Xeon 2.8 and 3.2 machines. I'm waiting now for them to > send me my email to access the server. The plan is if it runs better the 2.8 > box will be going down. So I suppose it's safe to say then that the box > should hold 2x12 + 1x24 CS 1.6, 1x32 COD4, and 1x24 TF2? The box we are on > now(Dual 2.8) has 2 GB of ram 100mbit connection windows 2003. Same setup > with the new server just different processor, and better ram/harddrives. > > -----Original Message----- > On Behalf Of "[??R] The-/<iller" > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:59 PM > > Dunno about your other specs but we did the same thing almost and went > from 1x32 dods 1x24 css and 2x32 tf2 to 2x32 dods 1x24 css 2x32 tf2 1x24 > tf2 1x13 tf2(with tv) and even when theyre all full only get about 90% > usage with pretty good tick rates still on full load > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature > database 3436 (20080911) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
