So it would seem the wanted options are;
1. non secure
2. secure with
a. option to kick only, no ban
b. option to kick and ban, with
1. option to report to global
2. option to use global list.
That about cover it? Sounds like it's just getting more complicated...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oscar N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules
> Hmm, about 100 new mails from only this list. I should have know better
> than to say some linux dist is better then someone else. But, who can
> refuse, muahahaha.... The simple answer is that no linux dist is
> better/more secure than someone else, the only thing that matters is the
> one who press the buttons...
>
> Anyway, to the point... I didn't actually read all the mails so I'm
> sorry if someone allready have came up with this idea.
> As not everyone seem to agree with each other about the future global
> ban list, why not make it an option as with everything else...?
> Then the admins who want to include all bans from the global list can do
> so, and they who don't want to include it can skip it and still run a
> secure server who protects against cheaters...
>
> And about reporting caught cheaters to the global list, hmm... Don't
> know really, but I'm sure there can be an option as well...
>
> /Oscar, www.bhood.nu
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
