Khyron wrote: > > Yah I could NAT with a 10.x or whatever, but avoiding NAT is the reason I > paid extra for the statics. I've been looking at Arp Proxy, but any of those > that I found on the net assumes you have a full subnet, as opposed to my > situation (several statics that are not all in sequence). The only other > thing I've found is a "bridge" but it's more of packet > sniffer/blocker/shaper than a true firewall/gateway.
Excuse me for asking a stupid question, but why was it that you can't simply have the Linux box act as a routing firewall for those 7 static IPs? I must have missed something. Florian. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
