Hmm, I think I did forget to specify -dir . so it probably defaulted to
left4dead or something.  Anyways looks like it was just me as others didn't
have same issue.

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:16 PM, David A. Parker <dpar...@utica.edu> wrote:

> Yeah, I've never seen it the other way around.  The only way I can think
> of that it would happen is if you installed it with the option "-dir
> left4dead".
>
> Joseph Laws wrote:
> > The installation path has always been ../l4d/left4dead for me.
> >
> >
> >
> > Daniel Worley wrote:
> >> Ah, when I ran the update it expected the root l4d folder to be
> "left4dead"
> >> when it used to be "l4d".  So I tried setting up symlinks which made it
> >> happy until I tried to run the server then it complained that it needed
> >> updates even though the update script said it was all good.  When I
> started
> >> fresh the steam program created a new left4dead folder with l4d inside
> of
> >> it, maybe it was just me.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:32 PM, ics <i...@ics-base.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
>
> --
>
> Dave Parker
> Utica College
> Integrated Information Technology Services
> (315) 792-3229
> Registered Linux User #408177
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to